Tag: donald-trump

  • Elon Musk: Service or Avarice?

    Elon Musk: Service or Avarice?

    Tesla stock value is declining. Whether due to violence at dealerships or other causes, this asset in Elon Musk’s portfolio is taking a hit. And for every “green” initiative that gets chopped, the electric car concept en toto devalues.

    The Founders’ idea (whether it ever happened before or not) was citizen service for a term, then a return to private life. “Service” in politics is a buzzword used to signal personal sacrifice. It’s bullshit, but that’s how it’s used. No politician says, “I spent a lifetime working in office.” They say “I spent a lifetime in public service.”

    Volunteers serve. Politicians work. Service does not mean and never meant building personal wealth. That’s just work. Go to work, collect check in exchange. Or perhaps investment builds wealth. Service does not. No one gets rich serving soup to the homeless or volunteering at the Special Olympics.

    Despite the financial whack and personal danger, Elon Musk persists on this personally costly and, frankly, dangerous path. It simply is not the path of greed. And your social security number really isn’t that valuable an asset.

    Ex-politicians charge stacks for speeches, consulting, and lobbying. God bless’em. How much money do you suppose the time of the richest man in the world is worth? Whether that time is spent giving speeches, consulting, or subcontracting, how much should such a person charge for his work product? If you were to hire Sundar Pichai, for example, to come speak to your company at a leadership retreat, how much might the bill be?

    Mr. Musk is not “stealing” as some ping pong paddles say. He is sacrificing. He is literally serving. He is subordinating his interests. His life is in constant danger as a result of this service. Agree with his actions or not, but he is definitely serving in the truest sense of the word.

    Clearly, the same applies to Donald Trump.

    The only reason people in such positions would do this is because they believe in it. If Sundar Pichai decides to do the speech for free, you can be assured it’s because he believes in it. He considers it important enough to absorb what can only be a tremendous opportunity cost.

    Liberal leaders are instinctively compelled to superimpose ulterior motives because true service does not occur to them. (I blame no one for being jaded.) By way of example, the “salary v net worth” metric applied to Nancy Pelosi illustrates clearly that she worked or invested in some way to hoard those stacks (I applaud every legally-gained dollar). Whatever she does, it is not altruism. She does not and never served. Democrat leaders do not serve. They profit. They do not sacrifice personal wealth.

    I do not, in any way, suggest that our leaders impoverish themselves or compromise quality of life to demonstrate purity of heart. They each should be paid (and very well) for excellent work product. But when someone truly sacrifices, truly serves, we should be grateful. I don’t know if I’ve ever seen such service and sacrifice in politics before, but the Musk/Trump phenomenon is either the first of its kind or the best-case example that ever happened.

    I am grateful for it.

    Thoughts?

  • Democrats: Please Be Honest; Your Soul Is At Stake

    Democrats: Please Be Honest; Your Soul Is At Stake

    Attractive young lady in a blind rage being arrested by police in a Tesla dealership

    The political divide cannot possibly be any more intense, but I am beginning to perceive a softening. I engage liberals and Democrats as often as possible to try to find common ground, to try to show that we have the same concerns. For many years now, any such attempt, even with strangers on Facebook, is met with viciousness. It takes maybe one volley in a debate before I get called “racist” or worse.

    

For the fist time in years, I engaged, and was met with courtesy and earnestness, if disagreement. Hope peeks through. I think some closer to the center are moving that way. The base on the far left, however, cannot make itself left enough, and are trying harder than ever. Sadly, they just come across as inhumanly vicious if not just plain stupid, or both.

    Folks on my “side” must be welcoming and courteous more than ever now. The United States endured a Civil War, and I still think the divide cannot be worse. All of us on the pro-America side must always take care to target only leadership in our criticism. We poke at the “victim class” mentality, but in this case, I honestly view our countrymen as legitimate victims of the most vicious sci-ops the world has seen. We are all human, and we are all susceptible to being swept up in a trend or reeducated via social pressure and engineering.

    The joint session address spectacle shocked me deeply. This is not hyperbole designed to trigger you or otherwise convince you of some argument point. It is what happened. I screamed at the TV, furiously posted on antisocial media, and on occasion was dumbstruck into silence and stared mute into every corner of my living room as though an answer would pop its head up. I could not believe what I was seeing. The aftermath is equally breathtaking.

    

I predicted a response of “It was so gross how Trump used those kids as props.” That would have been predictable and bad enough, but Democrat leaders outdid themselves. I have been saying for years that liberals compete with each other to show their personal hate for Trump is supreme. They want to be seen as the paramount Trump hater. It’s virtue signaling to them. It is part of the internal workings of the echo chamber.

    

When attempting to show goodness and virtue means supporting murder, autism, and insulting teenage cancer survivors, the virtue signaler really should take a pause. 



    Read that last line again.

    

Otherwise good people suddenly think shooting a man in the back is justified. They are under a cult spell. Their souls are in trouble. I am not religious, and yet I am concerned for these people’s very souls.



    Growing up, I had many democrat friends, some in positions of leadership. Some were (are) highly intelligent. They were creative, funny, and interesting people. One who I’ve known (not closely) for decades posted on antisocial media that with all the changes, people may be very stressed out. We don’t know what they are going through, and so we should be sure to treat each other with kindness and in particular, empathy. The use of the word “empathy” became ironic in the extreme after I commented. I realize in retrospect I was being naive, but I posted something like this:

    Would that such values crossed the partisan line. Rather than calling people racist sexist nazis all the time, perhaps we should treat folks with kindness and empathy, because we don’t know their lives or what kind of day they’re having. In short, I agree with your statement.

    Sure, I was being naive, but truly I hoped to create a bit of a bridge. This is/was an old friend, after all, and I want us to find our common ground. The reply was swift and devastating. Paraphrasing:

    Nothing against you personally, Matt, but all too often those charges are valid…

    I realized something. Liberals view others as less than human. I had been aware of it in the past, but forgot, because it is so unnatural to me that my brain ejected it at some point. My “friend” was happy to refresh the lesson. It hit. Hard. It made me instantly sad. I felt every bit of the rejection of an old friend, despite the disclaimer, which was completely hollow.

    First of all, the disclaimer “Nothing against you personally” is nothing more than salve for the conscience – or what fragments yet cling to life. But the next part… Wow. Empathy and kindness are reserved only for them. Anyone who falls outside the doctrinal limits, as we are all painfully aware by now, are “racists” or “sexists” or… it’s a long list of bad words, and they are each used to literally dehumanize you. And if you are not human, then you do not deserve kindness or empathy, and no one should feel compelled to extend it. Being unkind to a cockroach will not cause guilty feelings.

    

It’s a simple, effective, and necessary tactic for war-fighting. Humans who don’t know each other and have no quarrels don’t typically murder each other. It is not natural. So getting someone to aim a weapon and then pull the trigger at a perfect stranger who could be the sweetest person in the world – that requires training. Weapons training and more are part of the military. But the part where we dehumanize an enemy is (I hope) reserved for hot wars. This, of course, means Democrat leaders see our day-to-day life in America as a hot war, and only club members are human. Everything else is a legitimate target.



    If the target is a “towel head” or a “kike” or a “limey,” (or in my case, a straight white male) then the target may be eliminated with less guilt, less soul damage than if the target is a father of three, or a pastor, or a baker. We humans must find ways to dehumanize other humans when we abuse or kill them, otherwise we might feel bad. No one wants to feel bad when forced to do terrible unnatural things, and we cope however we can, however distasteful the needs of war become. Democrat leadership is training its people in war fighting tactics. And they still are not letting up, though their tent is shrinking rapidly as good people are breaking free from the spell.

    My heart broke in more than one place with that social media encounter. I felt the pain of rejection from a friend I enjoyed many times with, from parties and bar outings to Dungeons and Dragons campaigns. But I feel equally as badly for him. His soul is blackened to this point. It’s sad to see a person, otherwise good and well-meaning to force himself to hate so many people, including me (though of course, “nothing personal… just everything you say or believe.”)

    We will never ever cross our divide without debate, discussion, honesty, and dare I say it, empathy, even if only strategic empathy. But one is not morally, ethically, or principally called or obligated in any way to converse or otherwise confer with a dog or a hissing monkey. And that is how they are compelled to see everyone outside their echo chamber – but even worse. Racists and nazis are even worse than dogs or hissing monkeys. They can be exterminated like cockroaches. We all know we have a responsibility to assassinate Hitler if we ever get the chance to go back in time. Right? Democrats will spare a convict, but non-Democrats are offered no quarter.

    People who I’ve known for decades now add to the list of justifications for homicide, being Donald Trump, or being an insurance CEO, or being an active voter who does not vote like they do. The liberal body politic can move through the world in clear conscience because their searing hate is aimed squarely at subhumans who deserve death – just “nothing against me personally…”

    

Every SOTU has moments that are designed to make us all come together, at least for a moment. There’s always some cute amazing kid or a victim of something who survived. Every administration does it, and it should be a beautiful thing. Over the years watching, each time the full assembly stands, no matter which party is in office, I felt hope and optimism. This is the first joint session speech that had no such moment of hope or joy. (Where have I heard those words in political contexts?)

    

But the hatred is now so intense that Democrats forbade themselves even showing happiness for a teenage cancer survivor. Why? Because it might humanize anyone who is outside their echo chamber. They are to be seen as racists and nazis, not human beings who show caring and joy for such a young man. If Democrat leaders lose grip on the hate they mercilessly hammered into their base, they will lose that base, because there is no policy for rank-and-file to grip. Hate is the Democrat leader’s fuel. But it is not natural.

    

I have not seen a specific policy proposal from the Democrat party for a long time. Their last presidential candidate flatly refused to discuss policy – during the campaign.

    

I pray that the rank-and-file Democrat sees what is happening to him. He is paying club dues with his soul. And his club charges extraordinary dues. Those dues include hatred – and I mean hatred – for the club member’s countrymen. Social standing in that club is proportional to the size, scope, and depth of the hate display. The loudest, most obnoxious, most vicious hate displays are rewarded, so they go all in like a bird of hate paradise trying to score a mate. But his dance is vicious; it is neither beautiful nor interesting.

    

I ask all rank-and-file Democrats, please look harder in the mirror and at your leaders. You are the people who say you reject hate, but you are all strapped tightly into a hate breeding machine. You are 9 months pregnant with hate, but the baby is stuck. I feel very badly for you. No one should go through life hating that much.

    

When you find yourself throwing long-term friends down the drain for club standing, please take a breath, and take a look. When you reserve kindness and empathy exclusively for your clique, please ask yourself what is purpose and the nature of kindness and empathy.

    

Is it possible to be morally pure if kindness and empathy are selective based on party affiliation? No. Everyone knows that, even liberals. They reconcile by believing that at least half of our country (and with Trump’s ever-increasing popularity, that “half” grows) are subhumans. If the subhuman racist is shown kindness or empathy, he might be legitimized in some way. As we know, this “racist” half is “the greatest threat to American democracy…” and so must be marginalized, canceled, or murdered. Our future would be so bright without them, just like if Hitler had been murdered before his plan could take shape.

    This thinking is so dark I have had, and continue to have, a terrible time accepting that it exists at all, but it’s right here in front of us all and on antisocial media feeds all over the country and the world. The social and financial costs are incalculable. 



    I started this piece with the admonition that the pro-America team reserve our meaner side for leadership. I believe kindness and empathy matter most when extended to folks outside our clique. It’s easy to be kind to the like-minded. I grant no brownie points for it. I believe we have barrel loads in common as countrymen. U.S. leftist leadership does not allow for its members to see those commonalities. They apply terrible social pressure to their members, and have them contorting themselves into believing absurdities so incredible that they support scoffing at teenage cancer survivors or putting naked grown men in middle school girl locker rooms. 



    Your Democrat countrymen are suffering. The ones who cling to this mass hypnosis may be able to suppress their conscience for the duration of their lives, but it will burn their soul. If the pro-America side does not extend kindness and empathy, then all afflicted will be left alone if they decide to opt out of the ghoul’s club. We must not leave them alone. We must give safe harbor. They are undergoing moment-by-moment trauma as I type. 



    The point of this debate must be to find common ground. It must be to welcome anyone at any time who is able to break free from the cult. Breaking free takes an immense amount of courage. It must be encouraged. The assumption of great social risk must present a possible award. We must be able to welcome them into the light without judgment or mockery. We are all susceptible to scams, lies, and cult initiations. Many people scammed never tell the story for fear of looking stupid. But if no one speaks up, the scammer scams indefinitely. We must offer refuge to those afflicted. We are charged to show kindness and empathy, especially to our countrymen who are suffering under the ghouls currently running the DNC. Joe Lieberman left the building some time ago. These are not your Daddy’s Democrats, and the rank-and-file, our countrymen, our friends, need our help.

    That said, I will return fire. Kindness should not be mistaken for weakness. So if any “regular” Democrat comes at me, he sets the theater. May your training serve you well. As far as their leaders, I welcome them as well, but they don’t get kindness until repentance. They destroyed this country, tore its social fabric to shreds and turned their rank-and-file into vicious haters and foot soldiers. People died. Many people. Kids are mutilated and will never have the life they deserve. Cities burned for racist policy. The damage is hard to conceive due to its scope.

    To the rank-and-file Democrat, ask yourself, are you happy being so filled with hate, and being used as a tool to intimidate and demoralize your countrymen? Does this fight feed your soul and give you meaning? Do you honestly see racists hiding behind every grain of sand on the beach? Don’t answer me. Be honest with yourself.

    I think it’s corrosive to your spirit. I think it makes you smaller, sadder, and more bitter. Your leaders are all small, sad, and bitter, and they removed all doubt at that session. But they have lots of money to use as soul salve. Unless you’re benefitting from massive USAID grants, I really think you should ask what your party is doing to make your life better.

    Why are you in this party? We know it’s not policy, because, as mentioned, the last Democrat presidential candidate refused to touch policy. No Democrat is offering any policy ideas. They are creative enough to say “We’re the party of joy!” but not creative enough to mention a policy idea. The irony is thicker than the syrup rebranded from Aunt Jemima. They are creative enough to make cringy condescending videos pretending to be game heroes, but they lack the ability or desire to contemplate fixing any issue in the country. (Sound reasons exist, but that’s another writing.) So why do you participate? You are a tool to animate hate. You have no voice in your party if you disagree, and they don’t discuss policy. Why are you in the party? Do you really enjoy the hate that much?

    I seek common ground, and I want to build bridges. If you are a Democrat, please speak up. Was there anything about the joint address session that you would have liked to see go differently? Did your leaders comport themselves appropriately? If the former, what happens if you say so? Should saying “We should have shown the appropriate respect for a cancer patient or a permanently injured female athlete” fill you with fear? Are you afraid to speak against obvious wrongs? If so, I’ll set you a place at my table. My club is truly inclusive. You have no voice in yours. Your leaders tell you what to think, and excommunication awaits dissent. Test it if you don’t believe me. 



    Are you content being a parakeet? If so, stay put. If not, know that this country was built on the principle that you have a voice, and can use it without the government putting your head on a spike over the bridge.

    We all experience anger, hate, happiness, stress, and more. Our feelings and emotions are ephemeral, as they should be. The thrill of a roller coaster ride is fantastic. But it would be unnatural to try to force that feeling, even such a fantastic feeling, on a person for all time. Do not allow yourself to be forced into hating forever.

    

And if you’re on my “side” of the divide, I ask you to provide support and safe harbor for anyone who wants to enjoy free speech and a life in which hating someone else, anyone else, is not required dues for club membership. If we stick to discussing policy, and avoid speaking in the 2nd person when addressing “regular” people, we may give them reason to think their leaders are wrong. One wonders how many reasons it would take, but cult hypnosis is very powerful.

    

The joint address showed us all many truths in a very bright light. Democrat leaders behaved shamefully, and I thank them for it. I hope they continue to bravely show the depths of their blinding hate for all to see. We can then expect reason, and perhaps even kindness and empathy to take hold as more and more good people are disgusted and forced from the club. From there, folks like me can be welcoming and kind, and try to build the bridge that our country deserves, a bridge of unity.

  • This Is Not “Read My Lips.”

    This Is Not “Read My Lips.”

    This Is Not “Read My Lips.”

    Forward: First, if you never read “Art of the Deal,” you should doubt your ability to critique Donald Trump’s strategy on anything. This is especially true of the Parakeet Press, but really anyone. Did Zelensky read it? If not, I submit this as ample evidence of stupidity.

    President Trump keeps saying “This war never would have happened had I been president.” It is absolutely true. But I think he’s making a bigger (if simple) point that most miss. President Trump sees the world transactionally, and he is right to do so.

    President Trump’s point is simple, so simple that we instinctively overcomplicate it. A war happened. The world is irrevocably changed. There is no going back. Had he been president, it would never have happened. Period. That sounds like he’s bragging, and he may be, but there’s more to it. The philosophy behind his tactics/strategy is implicit. He would have communicated via whatever appropriate channel for any given issue, signals to Russia and/or Ukraine that would have prevented war. His mere presence in White House would likely have been enough. Great, so what’s the point of saying this?

    Joe Biden lied all day all night. American leftists never cared, and those on the right became desensitized to it, helpless to cause honesty to break out. From graduating top of the class at a law school he never attended in a historically black college that doesn’t have a law school, to having nothing to do with his son’s business, to having sushi lunch with Jesus Christ himself just last week while little black boys massaged his finely red-haired legs by the swimming pool, defending the vulnerable and helpless from the scourge of Corn Pop, Old Joe had stories to tell!




    
If everyone is honest, the war can end quickly, and with enduring peace. That’s the point. Of course, all this can apparently happen only with Donald Trump, and that is a bad thing for this world. We need more peacemongers! And who, among the US pantheon of politicians, I ask, is honest? Maybe there is more than one. Maybe. But I know one. And he is Donald Trump. Now that he is there, and the message is peace, it can happen, but everyone has to be honest. I’m looking at you, Zelinsky.

    How in the hell can any leader take this guy seriously or trust what he says? Well, they don’t. It is not possible to give a stumbling, drooling, spaced out, barely aware elder in diapers the respect needed by the office of the presidency. So they don’t. As long as USAID sends the funds, they don’t need or care about the words that dripped off Biden’s chin. Russia, one assumes, was not a US aid beneficiary, even from USAID, so all they had were words, and when a US president speaks like a 4-year-old spouting fantastical stories, well, I can’t imagine that inspires trust. “Just send the check, Joe.”

    What does the world do when the leader of its “free people” lies constantly (often without intent, I’m sure), and his VP pledges to change the world order they all so proudly pretend to defend? Invading a country violates international norms. Ok. So would moving NATO next door to an unwilling and adversarial country. Each maneuver shifts borders for all practical purposes. If Putin was wrong to invade, then Harris et al. were wrong to make NATO threats. The difference is that when a serious person who speaks truth tells you his red line, it is a red line. When habitual and cavalier liars tell you a red line, you have no reason to believe or respect it. Thus the Biden-Harris regime is responsible for this war, as much or more than Ukraine or Russia.

    What Ukraine has on its soil is a proxy war between American liberal leaders and Russia. It looks now, after the greatest unforced error in diplomatic history, like Zelinsky chose to side with America’s liberal elite, while conservatives offer a path to peace after the deal was done and just waiting on some ink. Holy crap. Again, I offer this as ample evidence of stupidity. American liberals lost the last election, and corrupted the one before, ascending to office sans mandate. They are not good advisors on what America’s interests are. Relying on the people who started the war in Ukraine to be good stewards of Ukrainian interests is a stupid as it gets, but it appears that’s what Zelinsky did.

    Donald Trump is honest. Love him or hate him, even democrats who wouldn’t know the truth if it slapped them in face have stopped calling Donald Trump a liar. For the first time in the modern era, Ukrainian and Russian leaders (and the rest of the world) have the option of taking a US president at his word. Sadly, Zelinsky is captured by American leftism. After gobbling up billions of our tax and debt dollars gleefully shot out like a cash cannon at Larry Flynt’s, he had good reason to maintain loyalty to the left. Unfortunately, like so many Americans, Zelinsky is/was too dumb to analyze Donald Trump himself. He clearly drank the Democrat kool aid, and since I actually get that analogy, I see images of dead Ukrainians littered with red cups in my head. I wonder if Zelinksy bothered to read any books written by Donald Trump about how he makes deals before he went to the White House to fuck up a deal with Donald Trump.

    President Trump sees the Ukraine situation transactionally, as he likely sees the whole world. He’s not wrong. Seen as a transaction, Russia “invested” enormous resources for its security. That investment includes a pile of bodies that totals hundreds of thousands at least, just on the Russian side. Add the cost of the war materiel and the opportunity cost of years of doing anything other than fighting a kinetic war. Russia gained territory (for now at least) as a result of this investment with some sense of enhanced security. The occupied areas may be viewed as a bit of a DMZ, if not necessarily finally decided to be Russian territory in perpetuity. But Russia sees that land as a buffer from NATO troops if nothing else.

    Zelinsky’s perspective is childish. How childish is it? Well, Russia went to war. No counter occurred that that would preserve Ukrainian territory or, frankly, sovereignty. Going to war is res ipsa loquitur not retreat. The very act of war is the rejection of anything the invaded had to say about anything. Saying that Russia should retreat for moral reasons may or may not be correct, but it is ineffective and impertinent – stupid and childish. The only suitable outcome for Zelinsky is Ukrainian victory. He thinks Russia should retreat to its pre-2013 borders, apologize, and pay reparations.

In one sense, Zelinsky is not wrong. Maybe I need more research, but Ukraine is in this position because of geography, not because of any geopolitical differences with Russia. So there should be no change in borders. Right? I’m sure the hatred between Russia and Ukraine is real now that the war is hot. But Ukraine is in this position because of the American left, and tragically, Zelinsky does not understand or appreciate the depth of the loss the American left was just handed. He probably believes they care about him and “have his back.” Sucker.

    The geopolitical problems are between the globalist Hillary Clinton branch of the West and Russia. Ukraine just happens to be in the unenviable position of being Russia’s nearest Western border neighbor. American Conservatives have no serious geopolitical issues with Russia. Some take issue with Putin himself on certain things, but the country of Russia is not as geopolitically adversarial with us as Hillary would have you believe.

    Maybe correct that the borders should not have changed, Zelinsky’s position is nonetheless nonsensical. Fighting a war is the opposite of security, which he says he wants. Imagine the mental gymnastics: “All my men are dead. All my ammo is spent. All my money is gone. I lost much territory. Billions in aid went missing, and we’re selling donated weapons rather than fight with them. Now for my demands! I want the United States to provide and pay for security, through NATO. Once that is in place, I will declare myself the victor of the war!”

    Props to him for having balls enough to try to make stupid sound palatable. But it is truly stupid and childish. 

Over the years I wondered why we would invade Iraq and then give it back. If the United States must pay for Ukraine, why is Ukraine not the United States? 

Donald Trump sees this all transactionally, and my God, I’ve been starved for this my entire life. The American leftist Parakeet Press is publishing stories hinting that since Europe is now making noises about combining forces to defend Ukraine, that Trump’s diplomacy failed. Stupid. If Europe steps up its defense cooperation with Ukraine, I say “mission accomplished.”

    The whole point about the “big beautiful ocean” is that Russia is not a next-door security threat to the U.S. To the degree Russia is a security threat, it is such in Europe far more than the other side of the Earth. Chicken Littles cheeping about Putin’s burning need for global dominance are nothing more than warmongers in chick costumes.

    I read an article in Ukrainian news today, and the author stated that it is now clear that the U.S. is aligned with Russia. Stupid. I guess when the world is forced to deal with liars all the time, that everyone assumes everyone is lying all the time. But we, the world, need to be insightful enough, and sadly brave enough, to see truth when it arrives. We must be able to judge individuals when necessary. Donald Trump did not fit neatly into either American political party. The Republican Party, however, is the only one in which Conservatives were not totally ostracized.

    Trump remade the party, and it is now a party made up of Conservatives. But the point is that Trump should not be viewed as Republican or Democrat. He is Trump. A party conformed to him. Democrats require party loyalty. Trump creates it. Donald Trump should be viewed as Donald Trump, and shocker of shockers, he should be taken at his word. I know you can’t do that in politics in general, but with Trump, yes, the man means what he says.

    

“Had Trump been president, this war would never have happened.” It’s true, but why? Simpletons and thieves want you to buy into yet another stupid two-state solution: “Putin invaded, therefore, Putin bad. Ukraine is victim, therefore Ukraine good. Putin go home. Putin pay Ukraine.” This has all the sophistication of “Palestine will run rivers of chocolate, kids will play in the streets, and Muslims and Jews will all hold hands in the land of plenty and sing Kumbaya if only Palestine can just get their own independent state.”

    

Ukraine got its own state. Problem solved!



    Just stop with the childishness. The entire point of Trump’s statement is that the world arrived at this place, and we can fix it, but we cannot turn back time. The only way to get Russia out of Ukrainian territory is force or negotiation. The last administration did neither, so any moron should be able to judge that war was the objective of the last administration. If you want to end a war, you take the steps to do so. Biden took no such steps. The best he did was tough talk, and it may be occurring to some that talk doesn’t make tough, and talking tough to tough guys who have all the leverage is… word of the day… stupid.

    The only path is forward. Backward is literally impossible. Families will still never see their sons. No amount of negotiations, reparations, apology, or continued war will change that. Stop assuming “alignments.” Align with peace and progress. If that means supporting one competitor country one way, and another in another way, OK. It’s not black and white.

    The old way of doing business is over, at least for now, and the world would do well to tune out American Democrats who know nothing beyond their insane unreasonable hate for Donald Trump. They will sacrifice any person, people, friend, or country, if they perceive it will damage Trump. I was not in the room when Zelensky had a huge meeting with American leftists before meeting with the President. But I know what happened anyway. They advised Zelinsky Trump is weak, and he, Zelinsky could look strong on the world stage. He lapped it up, and the display we saw was the result. I hate it for Ukraine.

    Ukraine media says Trump sided with Russia. Dumb. Zelinsky could have signed a deal that was done, and we would have peace. Now. Dumb.

    The entire point of “It would never have happened” is to stop putting your faith in liars. Know when you’re being lied to. The signs are usually quite clear. It’s easy to tell if the American parakeet press is lying. The cameras are on. Simple. You can spot leftist politicians lies when they speak. The lips will move. Simple. The converse is true about Trump. If the cameras are on and he is speaking, truth is being spoken. Doubt anyone who tells you otherwise, or go the way of Zelinsky. Be the sucker that would burn down his entire country to make Chuck Schumer happy.

    But know that it is true that “This war would never have, should never have happened.” And the takeaway is to both be honest, and seek honesty.

    Two cycles ago, a U.S. election was corrupted totally. This happens only with dishonesty. American politicos on the left lie constantly for their personal political purposes. Constantly. It has a corrosive effect on all human communication. The disservice done to Americans is incalculable, and it bled over into a Ukrainian war. The fog of war is bad enough, without Democrats making fog from peace.

    Be smarter. Be honest. Be vigilant spotting lies. 

When asked how he aligns, Trump says simply, “I align with peace.” Because we are so conditioned to lies and hidden subtext and motives it occurs to very few that it’s a perfect answer. But it is. We do not need to be forced into false binary choices – “Total victory or limitless war are your only options.” or “NATO membership or limitless war” or whatever. 



    Donald Trump impresses me constantly. He presents creative solution options where the rest of the world plays its same broken records. Tossing simpleton notions aside for practical solutions, he fixes things that everyone else breaks. He brings untold creativity to problem-solving. Supporter I have become, I didn’t know how great and creative the President could be until this term. Trump can solve Ukraine, but Ukraine’s leaders need to be honest, as do the Russians. Trump’s honesty is a known commodity now. If he and the leaders he works with are honest, the golden age can start sooner. I have faith that America is about to see its best years. I am grateful to be alive to see it, but I admit I am impatient, and liberals putting up roadblocks to peace and prosperity is truly demoralizing at this point. Imagine. Just pretend it happened. Pretend it went like this:

    “After a brief meeting, Presidents Zelinsky and Trump met with other dignitaries in the Oval Office where President Zelinsky signed an historic deal. They retired to the dining area where lunch was enjoyed in what can only be described as a light convivial mood. We sensed relief throughout the White House over the course of the day before President Zelinsky finally boarded his plane bound for huge celebrations back in his home country for a hero’s welcome. News from Russia after the break. Back to you, Dick.”

    Democrats would hate it. And that should scare the hell out of you.


    It is time to stop nonsensical Trump hate. That hate is dishonest, always based on lies, and it costs good people real money, resources, and even lives. I look forward to living in a time when “That war didn’t happen.”

    Thoughts?

  • Thanks So Much for the Unity!

    Thanks So Much for the Unity!

    Unity!

    The shooter did something the leadership of the Republican party could not, he forced Republican unity. I thank his bloody corpse for the gift. (I won’t mention his name ever). I grant that the moment required the presence of exactly one person, he being Donald Trump. I cannot – my imagination is not fertile enough –  conceive of any other Republican that would handle the assassination attempt the way President Trump did. If that bullet snipped Nikki Haley, she would not have risen with a fist and “Fight fight fight!” Ted Cruz? Nah. I don’t see the same fire, as much as I appreciate the job he’s done.

    I think a “normal” candidate stays very quiet for a couple of days, laying low, taking the advice of his handlers who no doubt would wish to sideline the candidate “for safety reasons.”  None of them would understand, as President Trump does, that the candidate is the boss.

    Indeed, the hopeful president must task the government organization to do its job, not fall in line with the one-dimensional needs of a government worker who wants her job to be smooth. In fact, President Trump, no doubt on advice of more “normal” people in his campaign and/or security orgs, considered postponing his convention appearance. He decided, smartly and bravely, to not let the murderer taint the schedule, nor to take orders from his servants. I cannot conceive of any other Republican responding the way President Trump has, which is simply perfect.

    The sitting president doesn’t understand his own leadership abilities. “I have a lot of questions. I better not start the questions. I’ll get in trouble,” is a typical quote from a confused old man who does not seem to understand that he occupies the highest office in our country. He subordinates himself and embarrasses all of us regularly. He sends powerful signals of his own weakness every day to every adversary we have.

    The Republican party historically offered little improvement or differentiation from Democrats, and lost massive battles, the kind that destroy American lives regularly and for decades since the Reagan years. This fact, if we believe his words (I see no reason not to), motivated Trump to run for president in the first. The Republican party was completely eviscerated and feminized when Trump arrived in 2016.

    Democrats are not as wildly conspiratorial as Conservatives and Republicans. They are the ones conspiring and scheming ways to install their candidate(s) without the inconvenience of voters’ will. The schemes are transparently moronic (Gays for Palestine LOL!), and supported by unsophisticated and obvious lies. We see it, we call it out, they reply that it’s a conspiracy theory to be discarded. Again, over and over, their stupid and incredibly unsophisticated lies become public failures.

    This case may force them to consider crazy theories. They might think something like the shooter clipped Trump’s ear on purpose, giving President Trump the opportunity to strike these incredible photographs. Many believe that no one is that good. Bill Maher stated “I gotta say this: He’s the luckiest motherfucker that has ever walked the face of the Earth.” He also said, “But that mug shot? Fucking nailed it. And he [reacted to the shooting] like he rehearsed it! [Got it on] take one! There will be idiot conspiracy theorists who will say, ‘Oh they planned it.’ He gets grazed and the other guy gets [killed] — that’s so Trump. It’s going to work for him. I can see the memes now — ‘the man the libtards couldn’t kill.’

    Saturday’s spectacle could only have the meaning it has with Donald Trump behind that podium. Liberals will indeed be annoyed at how perfect President Trump’s character shines more than ever now. I pray the rest of the Republican party, particularly leadership, is taking notes, and starting practice on the lessons taught by President Trump.

    As proud as we all are of the most unique, consequential, and conservative president in my lifetime, we must also share some disappointment with our Republican leadership. I look forward to the end of the McConnell era, and I hope he enjoys adult beverages with Boenher and Biden in retirement.

    A troubled young man brought unity to the Republican party. He did what party leaders could not (because they don’t care to). I am not a particularly religious man, though I side firmly with our Judeo-Christian founding principles. Even I can see the hand of God at work. It would be tough for me to debate that this troubled young man and President Trump himself, are not instruments of some divine design. The whole thing seems that miraculous to me.
     
    As welcome as this new Republican unity is, our country needs national unity. If Democrat leaders… never mind. Biden’s party is already parroting tired violent rhetoric, and Trump’s ear is barely scabbed over. If they ever shed their bitterness and racism, America and the world will enjoy a true golden age.

    Do you think Republican leaders will learn and change as a result of the failed attempt? Do you think Democrats will? I would ask the same of Biden and the press, but they have both already rejuvenated their old violent rhetoric and gaslighting. What say you?

    -Matt Beeson, 07/16/24

    Thoughts?

    Please share with reckless abandon. Facebook can suck it.